AMD SEMPRON 3400 DRIVER

AMD has moved the Sempron line away from Socket A and all the motherboard eccentricities that went along with it, so we have no problem recommending it for low-cost machines. Good performance for the price; best-of-class gaming performance; bit support; SSE3 support; and improved memory support. There are three major differentiators between Athlon 64 and Sempron lines:. All make fairly heavy use of the processor and memory subsystem. The smaller cache and lower pin count of Socket help AMD produce Sempron chips much more cheaply, and the small die size in combination with reduced clock speeds makes for a cooler-running chip, too. We extract two of the multithreading results from PCMark05 for one set of multitasking numbers, then run Photoshop Elements and Norton AntiVirus simultaneously as another test. We first performed an extensive set of benchmarks using good old bit Windows XP Professional.

Uploader: Shakree
Date Added: 24 March 2016
File Size: 56.27 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 6379
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

We also perform a pair of pure rendering tests with 3ds max, and run the latest POV-Ray 3. Sure, the Athlon 64 with its larger cache and larger price tag is faster than the Sempron, but the budget chip still manages to hold its own, and it just creams the Celeron D.

In our final test render, we see Intel close the gap a bit. AMD has moved the Sempron line away from Socket A and all the motherboard eccentricities that went along with it, so we have no problem recommending it for low-cost machines.

  HP M2727 PCL6 DRIVER

There are three major differentiators between Athlon 64 and Sempron lines:. In the real world, application optimizations can vary widely.

We can say this, though: Good performance for the price; best-of-class gaming performance; bit support; SSE3 support; and improved memory support.

AMD Sempron 3400+

The more expensive Athlon 64 chip is dramatically faster. Also, we used the rundll Now we turn to actual performance using real applications. The smaller cache and lower pin count of Socket help AMD produce Sempron chips much more cheaply, and the small die size in combination with adm clock speeds makes for a cooler-running chip, too.

In the low-budget lines, the tables are turned a bit. This Socket CPU runs at 3.

The Celeron line lacks Hyper-Threading, and it really hurts them. Our three test-bed systems sempfon the following configurations: Endnotes SPECapc 3ds max test: The performance difference between the Sempron and Celeron is just huge. It runs at 2. The hard drives were defragged prior to each major benchmark run.

bit Budget CPU: AMD Sempron + – ExtremeTech

We use three games, plus 3DMark05, to check out game performance. The reduced cache size affects both memory and CPU tests.

The story is the same in LightWave rendering. AMD has a winner here, despite the relatively high price. The Athlon 64 is a bit better than the Sempron, but both are quite a bit faster than the Celeron D.

  BLUETOOTH SSD-BT-819 DRIVER DOWNLOAD

The difference is just enormous, sempgon the Sempron completing the test encode almost twice as fast as the Celeron D.

We used Adobe After Effects 6. All amf fairly heavy use of the processor and memory subsystem. We extract two of the multithreading results from PCMark05 for one set of multitasking numbers, then run Photoshop Elements and Norton AntiVirus simultaneously as another test.

The Sempron soundly outpaces the Celeron D, and the Athlon 64 is a little faster still.

The games include Doom semprn, Painkiller 1. We first performed an extensive set of benchmarks using good old bit Windows XP Professional. In the SPECapc test of 3dx Max 6, which runs scripts that simulate interactive model and animation creation rather than simply final rendering, AMD steps all over Intel.

With a serious advantage in cache size, we would expect the Athlon 64 to perform better, but it also costs wempron. PCMark05 consists of a series of synthetic benchmark suites, each designed to test individual subsystems, such as memory, processor, and hard drive.